Waves in the Nucleus![]() |
The early models of the nucleus assumed that the protons
were
distributed uniformly over a sphere of radius R. The picture shows
the actual density profiles for mercury
(with 80 protons) and lead (with 82 protons). The density on
the y-axis is plotted against
distance on the x-axis with the center
of the nucleus in the middle. Distances in nuclei are measured in
fermis
- a unit that is 15 orders of magnitude smaller than a meter. The total
diameter of these nuclei is about 10 fermis. The circles are the
experimental densities obtained from the scattering of electrons from
nuclei. The experimental points are compared with a Hartree-Fock
calculation - the solid line. One observes two features that differ from the early
model. (1) The
nuclear density falls off at the surface over a distance scale of about
two fermis. (2) There are waves in the nuclear interior. These waves
are frozen in shape. Both of these
effects are related to the quantum structure in the nuclear shell
model. The density oscillations reflect the different orbits that are
filled as a function of increasing
proton number, and it is particularly interesting in this figure how
much
the oscillations change by the addition of only two protons. The work for this webpage was done in collaboration with Prof.
Werner Richter from the University of the Western Cape in South
Africa. |
![]() |
The picture on the left
shows the charge densities densities for
a
wider
variety of nuclei from silicon (with 14 protons) to lead (with 82
protons) as a
function of the radial distance from the center. The number above the
element
symbol is the total number of nucleons (protons plus neutrons). The
density
on the y-axis is measured in units of protons per cubic fermi. The
densities
for the nuclei beyond silicon are shifted so they do not overlap in the
plot. The data points are compared with two different
Hartree-Fock
calculations (the solid and dashed lines). For more details about the data and theory for nuclear waves see Physical Review C67, page 034317 (2003). |